Jordan Lee, here's your plan
Five things below: what AI can take, what stays yours, where you sit across the five dimensions, the one task worth installing first, and what to do about it. Every number traces back to an answer you gave.
The plan, task by task
AI takes: the transcript, the summary and the action list
Tool: Copilot in Teams, or Granola
The check: correct owners and dates before the note goes out
AI takes: the reshaping, cleaning and de-duplication
Tool: Copilot in Excel, or ChatGPT with a file upload
The check: spot-check ten rows and the totals
AI takes: first-draft replies and a sorted inbox by category
Tool: Copilot in Outlook, or Gemini in Gmail
The check: read the draft against the sender's ask before sending
AI takes: first drafts and tightening passes on standard formats
Tool: Copilot in Word, or Claude for longer pieces
The check: confirm every claim and number against your source
AI takes: structure, first-pass slides and speaker notes
Tool: Copilot in PowerPoint, or Gamma
The check: you set the argument; AI only fills the frame
What stays yours
About 5.2 hrs a week of your recurring load needs your judgment to happen at all. Separately, these are the parts of the job that were never in that pile:
That stays yours. It also gets more valuable as the rest gets cheaper.
Your five dimensions
Your biggest unlock
Meeting notes and follow-ups
This is the single biggest recoverable block in your week at about 3.3 hrs. Install this one first, with the check attached, before you touch anything else on the list.
Why this happened
They rolled out the tools and called it training.
What gets deployed in a rollout is access: a login, a licence, maybe a lunchtime demo. What does not get deployed is the plan. Which task, which prompt, which check, run at which point in the week. Access without a process produces a spike of use and then a return to the old way, because the old way is the one with a slot in the calendar.
We see this in every room we teach, and the rooms are not short of capable people. Same gap at the World Bank, at the European Central Bank, at universities, at founders working alone. Everyone arrived with access and nobody arrived with a plan. If that is where you are, you are in the majority, not behind it.
You have been carrying this for about six months. None of that time was a talent problem. You were under-supplied, not behind, and the plan above is the part that was missing.
Your profile: Stranded Hours
The hours are recoverable and nothing is sequenced to go get them. This isn't a talent gap. It's a plan gap, and plan gaps are the fixable kind.
Nothing above requires new tools or permissions. It requires a sequence, run in the same order every week, until the calendar stops arguing with you.
You said time is the blocker, which is why the plan above starts with one task rather than ten. Installing the top row alone recovers more than most people get from a month of reading about AI.
Your next step
Take the plan to your manager
The tools are already licensed. What is missing is the process, and that is a much easier conversation than a request for new software.
This is a summary of a task-level AI assessment completed for the Marketing / Comms function. It looks at the recurring work actually in the role, task by task.
It found roughly 7.3 hrs a week of that work could be handled with tools the organisation already licenses, releasing that capacity for reading the room and institutional context.
The recommended next step is structured training in workflow installation rather than tool familiarisation. The access is already in place; the process for using it is not.
Your result says it plainly: your strongest dimension is Judgment at 85/100, and 7.3 hrs a week is sitting in work that does not need you.
That is not a talent gap. It is a workflow gap, and it is exactly what Mia's AI Bootcamp does for you: two weeks, live, building these workflows on your actual job, with the checks attached, so the busywork goes to AI and the 7.3 hrs comes back to you.
You said time is what stopped you. That is the reason it runs live in two weeks, on the tasks already in your week, rather than as a course you have to find room for.
So what is it
Mia's AI Bootcamp
Two weeks, live, for non-technical professionals. You bring your real tasks. Each session you install one workflow on that work, attach the check that makes it trustworthy, and leave with it running. Not a video library, and nothing you have to find time to catch up on.
Taking meeting notes and follow-ups, your biggest single block at about 3.3 hrs a week, and turning it into a workflow that runs without you rebuilding it every Monday.
Two weeks will not make you technical. It installs three to five workflows in your real week, with the checks attached, so they're still running in November. It will also open up your mind to future workflows.
Recovering 7.3 hrs a week is about 335 hours a year. The bootcamp is $595 and runs live over two weeks.
See the next cohort →Your employer already bought the tools. Reimbursable, itemised invoice and a template request email included.Who we train
The same framework is taught live inside these institutions:
"I came in with nearly zero knowledge and a lot of distrust about AI. I now feel confident in how I can work with AI in valuable ways in my day-to-day as employee."
May 2026 cohort · Mia AI Bootcamp participant"The bootcamp has completely shifted my perspective from simple tool usage to designing automated workflows. It has streamlined how I map business pain points to AI solutions."
Cole B. · Bootcamp participant